pAAV-CAG-GFP in Guinea pig (AAV Retrograde)
Addgene #37825-AAVrg
- Data Submitted By
- Nichole Beebe and Brett Schofield
- Submission Date
- August 14, 2019
- Publication Date
- August 14, 2019 (modified May 16, 2023)
- Abstract
- Not Provided
Any further use of this image requires permission from the lab who submitted the data.
- Vector Used
-
pAAV-CAG-GFP
Addgene #37825-AAVrg
Virus & Injection
Virus
- Virus Name
- pAAV-CAG-GFP
- Serotype
- AAV Retrograde
- Source
- Addgene
- Catalog Number
- 37825-AAVrg
- Promoter
- CAG
- Cargo Type
- Control
- Injection Titer / Dose
- 5.00E+12 GC/ml
- Injection Volume
- two 0.05 μl injections (0.1 μl total)
- Injection Rate
- 20 nL/min
- Injector Material
- Not Provided
- Injection Site / Route
- Inferior colliculus, NeuroNames ID : 476
- Additional Details
- The injection was made into the inferior colliculus in an attempt to label neurons in other brain regions (e. G. Contralateral inferior colliculus, lower brainstem auditory nuclei, auditory cortex) that make projections to the inferior colliculus.
Other Details
- Species
- Other
- Other Species
- Guinea Pig
- Strain or Cell Line
- N/A
- Source
- Not provided
- Other Information
- The subject weighed 358 g (corresponding to an approximate age of 6-7 weeks).
- Age at Injection
- 6-7 weeks
- Time After Injection
- 5 weeks
- Detection Method
- Direct fluorescence
- Assay & Results
- Of all neuronal types that could potentially have expressed the virus, only pyramidal cells in the auditory cortex were detectable by observing direct fluorescence. This virus seems to work in a very pathway-specific manner (at least in guinea pigs). We expected that any neurons that make projections to the inferior colliculus might express EGFP in the tissue due to the general CAG promoter present in the virus, but only pyramidal cells in the auditory cortex were detectable by observing direct fluorescence
- Target Cell Transduction
- There were multiple brain areas where we should have seen fluorescent cells, and we only observed them in one area. The areas of input from these nuclei overlap in the injected nucleus, so the best explanation for this observation is cell-type specificity in either infection or expression.
- Other Information
- Very little toxicity or inflammation were present at the injection site